HIGH EXPECTATIONS: WHAT RESCHEDULING MARIJUANA COULD MEAN FOR THE CANNABIS INDUSTRY

A Note by Elsie Layman

Download the full Note here.

On January 12, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a review addressed to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that recommended marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) be rescheduled from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substance Act.[1] The unredacted recommendation was released as a result of the effort of Matthew Zorn, who filed a Freedom of Information Act complaint against HHS in September 2023.[2] Zorn announced the recommendation would be released on January 11, 2024 on his blog, writing: “I win . . .  Impossible just takes a few weeks.”[3] The release of this recommendation is a win not only for Zorn and people who enjoy the drug recreationally, but for the U.S. cannabis market, which was valued at $13.2 billion in 2022.[4]


[1]Read the rest

BIPA VS. CUBI: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MAJOR BIOMETRIC PRIVACY ACTS IN ILLINOIS AND TEXAS

A Note by Anastasiia Cheban

Download the full Note here.

Over the past several years, the Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) has expanded in scope and other states have adopted similar acts.[1] BIPA requires businesses and private entities that collect any biometric information from individuals to disclose that collection.[2] The act prohibits collecting, capturing, purchasing, or obtaining an individual’s biometric information without a written disclosure of the nature of the collection.[3]

Other states have also been influenced by Illinois’ legislation on the collection, retention, and sale of biometric information.[4] For example, Texas adopted a similar statute in 2009, titled, the “Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act” (CUBI).[5] The act is structured similarly to BIPA; however, it has significant differences that affect its enforcement, which has affected the number of lawsuits brought under the act.[6] Although there are only three states that … Read the rest

FROM GUIDELINES TO GRIDLOCK: THE CHALLENGES FACING DOJ AND FTC’S NEW MERGER GUIDELINES AND THE PATH FORWARD

A Note by James Zhang

Download the full Note here.

The year of 2023 has seen the lowest level of M&A activity in over a decade, since the period after the 2008 global financial crisis.[1] Inflation, rising interest rates and fear of a recession halved Global M&A deal values to $2.5 trillion USD from their peak of more than five trillion dollars in 2021.[2] In the midst of such difficult situations, increasing regulation scrutiny has cast yet another shadow over the flickering future of the M&A market.

On December 18, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released the 2023 Merger Guidelines.[3] This is the final version after gathering public feedback from the draft version released in July 2023.[4] This guideline marks another step forward of the Biden administration’s aggressive and interventionalist antitrust policy.[5] It not only lowers … Read the rest

When to Disclose Data Breaches under Federal Securities Laws

By Steven Wittenberg

Download full article here.

Hacking and cybercrime are on the rise.[1] From 2013 to 2015, twenty major data breaches were reported at Fortune 100 companies.[2] Publicly traded companies who have securities disclosure obligations should be aware of their duties under the federal securities laws when it comes to data breaches and hacks.[3]

In 2011, the SEC Division of Corporation Finance issued guidelines for cyber incidents.[4] The SEC stated, “[A] number of disclosure requirements may impose an obligation on registrants to disclose such [cyber] risks and incidents,” although there are no explicit requirements referring to data breaches.

While major data breaches may be material to reasonable investors of public companies, there is no duty to promptly disclose the occurrence of cyber incidents unless there have been selective disclosures, previous misstatements or circumstances making the omission of the hack misleading.[5] The federal securities laws … Read the rest

A Fiduciary Duty Requirement for Financial Professionals is Great, in Theory

By: Joe Zender

On April 6, the Department of Labor released a new regulation pertaining to the duties owed by financial advisors to their clients.[1] The new regulation, which is scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2018, transforms fundamental aspects of the financial services industry.[2]  The new rule, called a fiduciary duty rule, requires financial professionals to act in the best interest of their clients.[3] While a savvy investor or an ethical advisor may have already required this as part of their relationships, many retail investors do not know the ramifications of such a duty. The new rule forces this type of duty.  Opponents of the rule argue that the new regulation will increase costs across the financial services industry, which could force small budget investors out of the advising market, during a time when they could use it. At the same time, those who … Read the rest

New York’s Legally Dubious and Harmful Sodium Labeling Scheme

By: Joseph Zender

In September, New York City’s Board of Health (“Board”) passed an ordinance that requires restaurants to post warnings on items on their menus that are have high sodium content.[1] The National Restaurant Association is challenging the new law in state court on the grounds that it is overly burdensome and that it circumvents the legislative process.[2] The new law would require restaurants with more than 15 locations nationwide to place a black triangle next to any item on their menu that contains more than 2,300 milligrams (0.08 ounces) of sodium.[3] Not only is the New York City Board of Health’s move legally dubious by circumventing the legislative process and overly burdening the restaurants, it will also have unintended consequences that will affect the community at large in adverse ways.

The sodium posting requirement is reminiscent of another action by the Board back in 2012, … Read the rest

The Best Offense Is a Good Defense: The Strategic Value of Building a Strong Corporate Culture

By: Matthew Lowe

I. Introduction

In 2014, a University of Virginia Law Professor, Brandon L. Garrett, wrote a book entitled: Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations. In his book, Garrett inadvertently outlined a strategy for companies to follow, which would allow them to increase morale and productivity while also putting measures in place to avoid damaging litigation. Relying on the development and successful implementation of a healthy, viable corporate culture, the benefits of this strategy should serve as the catalyst for wide scale adoption.

II. Background

In the 1930s, a Republican attorney by the name of Conrad Printzlien left his position in the district attorney’s office in the Eastern District of New York to work as a probation officer.[1] While this voluntary career shift meant a 50% salary reduction, Printzlien accepted the position partially due to the urging of the court, but also because he … Read the rest

The Overreach of the E.P.A.: Fact or Fiction?

 

 

            Earlier this month the House Energy and Commerce Committee passed a bill, the “Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011,” which, if it becomes law, would effectively halt the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed program to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.  This is one of many attempts in an ongoing campaign by Republicans to limit the power of the EPA to make and enforce regulations related to greenhouse gas emissions.  They are attempting this through budgetary control measures as well as by attempting to strip the EPA of its regulatory authority in this area through legislation. There appears to be an intentional effort to cast this as a battle between the legislative and executive branches.  However, this is actually a battle royal including all three branches of the federal government, as well as many state, local, and private organizations.  It is important to look at the recent history of this fight … Read the rest