This
second article in the series first identifies past assumptions of the
traditional investment model. Possible additional benefits and
drawbacks of morally responsible investing (MRI) as compared to the
traditional model are pointed out along the way. Finally, future legal
issues that MRI may raise are identified, and the court’s likely
treatment of such issues is hypothesized.
II. Getting Past Those Assumptions
Several assumptions from traditional economic theory and law
seemingly hinder MRI. However, the premises underlying these
assumptions are not on as solid footing as once perceived. Some of
these assumptions include A) the decreased profitability of MRI, B) the
legal doctrine that a director’s sole responsibility is to maximize
profits and C) the gap between ownership and control in the public
corporation cannot be closed.
Assumption A. Traditional economic theory assumes that MRI is
less profitable than traditional instruments because profit
maximization is not the only