A rose by any other name may still smell as sweet, but execs at Dana
Corp. recently discovered that calling executive compensation by
another name did not pass the smell test in court. S.D.N.Y. Bankruptcy
Judge Burton Lifland recently denied Dana's proposed executive
compensation package as contrary to the provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code. [1] Nearly one year after BAPCPA, has the Dana case finally ushered in a new approach to evaluating executive compensation plans, as envisioned by Congress?
Executive Compensation After BAPCPA
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act, enacted
last October, added some severe restrictions on the ability of Chapter
11 debtors to adopt so-called "pay to stay" executive compensation
plans. [2]
New Code section 503(c) establishes the guidelines for insider
retention, bonus, and severance plans, also known as KERPS. [3] Under
the new evidentiary standards,the Code bars bonuses to corporate
insiders as an inducement to stay … Read the rest