In this essay I seemed to fail at the task of analyzing the I-Books. Due to me not understanding the rhetorical triangle and fully analyzing the book itself. The “I-Book” was a primary source for students, like we have primary sources for writing our papers.  The information inside was trusted to be accurate, and it was peer reviewed by the Illini Union Board. My revision process focuses on getting back to the rhetorical triangle by stating the warrants of the I-Book.  The book is a representation in what the students at the university used as resources.

In my overall paper there were a ton of incomplete thoughts, this made my paper unclear. I also had to go back to my hand book and some of the slides about sentence structure and passive voice. I decided to go and even read some of the prompts about good writing. The process was pretty much straight forward and it was clear that I left a good amount of the paper undone and didn’t fully complete what was being asked by me.