Reflection of Revision of Critical Response #1

I realized as I was revising this critical response that many times I could have had much better word choice in order to make my idea clear to the reader. For example I referred to Snopes.com as an “article” and in a response that I talked about multiple articles, using that word was not a very good choice and can easily confuse the reader. I feel as if I used the evidence in the articles well to support my thesis. However, I could have been a bit more specific in showing how the articles support my thesis. Overall this was a good critical response but for future works I need to have better words choice and keep the reader in mind while writing.

 

What I've done and want to improve on as a writer