News

The Blueprint for Equitable Digital Participation

I was honored to participate in a webinar on July 1st to celebrate Dr. Alisa Valentin and Claudia Ruiz’s excellent new paper, titled “The Blueprint for Equitable Digital Participation” from Public Knowledge, UnidosUS, and the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA).

From the Benton Institute: “This webinar, featuring the authors of The Blueprint for Equitable Digital Participation and leading experts in the digital equity field, will offer ideas for how policymakers can ensure low- to middle-income households across America can gain and sustain access to high-speed, reliable internet, connected devices, and digital skills.”

It was wonderful to join Alisa, Claudia, and my other amazing colleagues, Regina (Gina) D. Cooper Benjamin, Dr. Dominique Harrison Aluko, Dr. Bianca C. Reisdorf, and Dr. Caroline Stratton.

More information about the event can be found here: https://www.benton.org/event/blueprint-equitable-digital-participation

New Tech Policy Press Op-Ed

Cook County Digital Equity Director and visionary leader, Kyla Williams Tate and I have a new piece up at Tech Policy Press. In it, we share our perspectives on why our federal government needs to restore the Digital Equity Act. Mainly, we argue that federal funding is required to sustain the ecosystems that digital equity requires.

Here’s a blurb from our op-ed in today’s Tech Policy Press.

Healthy ecosystems require sustained investment. Without it, progress slows while the surrounding environment continues to change rapidly. One year later, the argument for restoring the Digital Equity Act is not primarily a financial one. It is an ecological one. Digital equity is not a pipeline that can be turned on and off. It is a living and resilient environment, shaped by trust, sustained by relationships, and dependent on the kind of investment that the Act was designed to provide.

Libraries in a Democratic Ecosystem

I’m excited to join my friend and colleague, Claudia Șerbănuță for the first in a series of engaging discussions on “Libraries in a democratic ecosystem” hosted by Acesso Cultura.

As the website explains (also below):

Online debates

5, 12, 19 May (Tuesdays) and 25 May (Monday)
7-9pm CET
The debates will be held in English. They will not be recorded.

Register here

Human beings are not “naturally” prepared to live in democracy. In “Cultivating humanity”, philosopher Martha Nussbaum reminds us that that “people need to be fitted for freedom”, that “freedom of thought and human dignity are capabilities to be developed”, and that our role (in our case, as cultural organisations”, is to to produce free citizens, citizens who are free not because of wealth or birth, but because they can call their minds their own.”

In this context, it is relevant to explore the role of libraries in the democratic ecosystem, at a time where democracy is under pressure. Like other institutions, libraries are also vulnerable to being caught up in and coopted by the status quo. Pressure may come from political/partisan interference, from the growing lack of trust in “the system”, from mis- and dis-information, from artificial intelligence (AI), from policies and actions that aim at excluding citizens from civic participation.

Even though, there is something about the nature of information that seeks to escape containers that in some ways, forces the library as a system to push towards access, despite what the rule-bearers think or do. Libraries are still trusted; libraries are still open and free; libraries offer a place to sit, access information, read, debate, connect and create A place to train and actively defend democracy.

We invited four librarians and asked them to choose their pair for these debates.

We thank Filipa Barros for co-curating these debates.

Programme

5 May, 7-9pm CET
Claudia Șerbănuță with Colin Rhinesmith

12 May, 7-9pm CET
Filipa Barros with Renan Leite

19 May, 7-9pm CET
Alexander Soto with Dalitso Mvula

25 May , 7-9pm CET
Tracie Hall with Alberto Manguel

The link to register is here.

Book Talk at MSU Quello Center

I will be giving my first book talk on Wednesday, February 18th at 11:00am (EST) at the Quello Center at Michigan State University, where I am a Research Fellow. The book will be published in June 2026 by the University of California Press. Here is the link to the event on the Quello Center’s website.

The talk will be online and the link to register is below.

Digital Equity Ecosystems:
How Community Coalitions Reduce Inequality and Strengthen Democracy

a talk with Colin Rhinesmith, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Join us on February 18, 2026, from 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM ET for a stimulating talk!

Use the link here to register for the Zoom webinar: https://tinyurl.com/47ukftct

Presenting My Research at ASIS&T 2025

Ebubechukwu Uba

As a member of the Digital Equity Action Research (DEAR) Lab, I spend much of my time thinking about how technology, learning, and community realities intersect, especially in rural and underserved settings. This year, I had the opportunity to share a part of my work at the 2025 Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology in Washington, DC.

My presentation, Beyond Technology First Narratives, Reframing Rural Educators as Information Professionals, is one piece of my research on understanding and highlighting the real conditions that shape educational technology use in rural Nigeria. In many national conversations, technology is framed as the solution to educational challenges, but the day-to-day work of rural educators tells a different story. They not only function as teachers, but they have taken up roles that place them to function as information professionals. They function as trusted information guides, curriculum interpreters, community advocates, and local knowledge organizers. These roles look a lot like the work done by information professionals, even though they are rarely recognized as such.

Sharing this at ASIS&T gave me the chance to highlight the importance of my work. When we view rural educators as information actors, it alters our perspective on technology design and policy. Instead of still imposing tools that assume urban or Western conditions, systems that reflect the lived realities of rural communities would be built. This perspective reframes global conversations on digital equity toward approaches that value local knowledge rather than overwrite it.

Although this work focuses on Nigeria, the issues connect to rural communities worldwide. Lots of regions face similar challenges in terms of infrastructure, language, and access to relevant information. By highlighting the people who already support learning in these contexts, my research contributes to broader conversations about how we can design more inclusive educational technologies and policies.

If you’d like to see the poster I presented, you can access it here.

My work aligns with global efforts to create more inclusive, community-driven approaches to technology and education, inviting researchers, policymakers, and EdTech designers to recognize that meaningful digital equity begins with understanding the people who shape learning every day. I look forward to the next phases of this project, which will involve deeper community-based research and international collaboration.

DNHV: Report Highlights and Recommendations

The Southeastern New York Library Council released a new report today, titled “DNHV: Report Highlights and Recommendations.” I am thrilled to have played a small part in this report, which outlines the findings from research on data gathered by the Southeastern NY Library Resources Council about the Digital Navigators of the Hudson Valley program between 2022–2024.

Here’s an excerpt from the Executive Summary:

“L&G Research and Evaluation Consulting, working in partnership with the Digital Equity Research Center at the Metropolitan New York Library Council, analyzed data gathered by the Southeastern NY Library Council about the Digital Navigator program between 2022–2024. The research team found many benefits for public libraries, underscoring the necessity of these services for libraries and other community-based organizations in their regions. Because nationwide indicators for measuring the outcomes and impacts of Digital Navigator programs do not currently exist, we believe the findings in this report will help to inform efforts to develop indicators in the future.”

Download the full executive summary and summary of data findings to learn more about the impact of the program.

Digital Equity Action Research (DEAR) Lab
Email: crhines@illinois.edu