About Sarah Kendzior: Dr. Kendzior is an anthropologist and communications scholar who studies digital media and politics. Her research interests include the ways in which the internet affects political mobilization, privacy, trust and self-expression with a focus on the authoritarian states of the former Soviet Union, including Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. Topic of the class: Political Culture in the Digital Age

What role does political culture play in shaping how people interact online? Since the Arab Spring, the internet has been hailed as a medium which allows citizens of authoritarian states to mobilize against their governments. Often overlooked is how the internet impacts relationships between the dissidents themselves. Dissidents struggle with problems of audience, authorship and anonymity exacerbated by both the online environment and by the political norms of an authoritarian state. In this class, we will read about the dissidents of Uzbekistan, one of the most repressive states in the world, and discuss how political culture shapes online interaction. Structure of the presentation:

• Overview of the presentation
• Uzbekistan political culture
• Dramatic change in 2005
• Bohodir
• Ethnography
• Internet propaganda
• Uzbek Exiles
• Uzbek children abroad

Reading

Sarah Kendzior. “Digital distrust: Uzbek cynicism and solidarity in the Internet Age”.American Ethnologist 38 (3): 559-575

Supplemental Readings

 Sarah Kendzior

“The Strange Saga of a Made-Up Activist and Her Life—and Death—as a Hoax”

Sarah Kendzior

“Digital Freedom of Expression in Uzbekistan: An example of social control and censorship in the 21st Century”

About Tim Wedig: Dr. Wedig holds a PhD in Government and Politics from the University of Maryland, College Park. Research and teaching interests are focused on approaches to sustainable peacebuilding, conflict prevention, humanitarian intervention, and information technology. Dr. Wedig has over 15 years’ experience in designing and facilitating simulation exercises for classroom and professional training environments.

Topic of the class: What is the long-term experience and success of these movements/organizations? Have they continued to rely on the internet or have they established/added new methods/structures/tools? Is their impact still influential?

Structure of the presentation:

• Chip’s Introduction
• Wedig Background
• Overview of the lecture
• Anti-globalization
• Free Burma
• Dean for America
• Conclusion

• Chip’s Introduction

• Wedig Background

• Overview of the lecture

• Anti-globalization

• Free Burma

• Dean for America

• Conclusion

Readings

Democracy and Human Rights – Free Burma
Danitz and Strobel (1999). “The Internet’s Impact on Activism: The Case of Burma.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism.

Transnational Activism – Anti-Globalization
Van Aiest and Walgrave (2002). “New Media, New Movements? The Role of the Internet in Shaping the ‘Anti-Globalization’ Movement.” Information, Communication, & Society.

Political Campaign – Dean for America
Hindman (2005). “The Real Lessons of Howard Dean: Reflections on the First Digital Campaign.” Perspectives on Politics.

About Yan Li: Since September, 2004, Dr. Li has been working at Institute of Educational Technology, College of Education, Zhejiang University. Her research interests include distance education, ICT education, media education, diffusion of educational innovations, and etc. In recent years, she has presided several research projects and has published series of academic papers or books in area of educational technology.

Topic of the class: 

The digital divide and media education in China

Structure of the presentation

About Jon Gant: Dr. Jon Gant is a professor at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where he serves as the Director of the Center for Digital Inclusion (CDI). Jon is a national leader in the areas of digital inclusion and broadband adoption. In the past two years, Jon has published groundbreaking research in the areas of Internet access and use, including co-authoring the first report to examine broadband adoption among minority communities.

Topic of the class: Strategies for building digital communities Structure of the presentation:

• Chip’s introduction
• Understanding the internet
• Broadband technology opportunity program
• Digital mismatch
• Open government
• Corporate data
• Freedom of Information
• Lying on the internet
• Data.gov
• More inclusive technology

• Chip introduction

• Understanding the internet

• Broadband technology opportunity program

• Digital mismatch

• Open government

• Corporate data

• Freedom of Information

• Lying on the internet

• Data.gov

• More inclusive technology

Reading

Jon Gant & Nicol Turner- Lee. 2011. Government Transparency: Six Strategies for More Open and Participatory Government.

Title of the class: Theory and history of political use of social media

Structure of the class:

• What is social media?
• What is hardware?
• Digital democracy
• Civil Society
• Public Sphere
• First wave
• Asking Questions about social media

• What is social media?

• What is hardware?

• Digital democracy

• Civil Society

• Public sphere

• First wave

• Asking questions about social media

Readings

Fuchs, C. (2012). “Some Reflections on Manuel Castells’ Book “Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age.” Triple-C.

Guest Speaker: Sarah Gaby (UNC-Chapel Hill, Sociology)

About Sarah Gaby: Sociology doctoral student at UNC-Chapel Hill, research interests include the ways in which sites such as Facebook and Twitter work to link supporters of social movements.

Structure of the presentation

• Introduction of Sarah Gaby made by professor Chip Bruce.
• Introduction by Sarah Gaby
• On Civil Rights  Movement
• Occupy Movement (preparation, on the ground and online)

Introduction of Sarah Gaby made by professor Chip Bruce.

Sarah Gaby introduces her interest  in Occupy movement and the research she conducted together with Neal Caren.

Has Social Media changed the ways in which social movements get organized? Take a look at Civil Rights movement.

How Occupy Movement came about

Watch also:

Preparations for the Occupy Movement

Occupy Movement as it developed on the ground

Occupy Movement online

Readings

Sarah Gaby and Neal Caren. 2012. “Occupy Online: How Cute Old Men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 US Users to OWS on Facebook.” Social Movement Studies.

Clay Shirky. 2011. “The Political Power of Social Media.” Foreign Affairs.

Watch also:

About leva Dmitricenko: Dr. Dmitricenko is Faculty of Social Sciences Lecturer, and Marketing & PR Advisor at Vidzemes Augstskola University of Applied Sciences in Valmiera, Latvia. Her research interests include political communication, political marketing, marketing, modern marketing strategies, advertising, communication tools.

Topic: Political Technology as a post-Soviet school of Political Consultancy

In contemporary democracies political campaigns have become the most important component of the political process. Considering the significant role that political campaigns play in politics, the assistance of Western states in the promotion of democracy in the post-Soviet domain after the collapse of the USSR also manifested itself as targeted efforts to train young democrats on matters of the planning and implementation of political campaigns. Yet, as time progressed, a school of political consulting emerged in the post-Soviet realm that was unique to the region and is labelled “Political Technology”. The aim of the lecture is to give an insight into this phenomenon.

Readings

Krastev I. (2006) Democracy’s “Doubles”. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 17, Number 2, pp.52 – 62

Hutcheson D.S. (2006) How to in elections and influence people. Journal of Political Marketing, Vol. 5 (4), pp. 47 – 70

Ledeneva A.V. (2006) How Russia Really Works. New York: Cornell University, pp. 28 – 57

• About Markus Schulz: Dr. Schulz’s research focuses on democratization, social movements, and new media from a transnational and comparative perspective. He has co-authored the six-volume book series Internet and Politics in Latin America, and co-edited the forthcoming monograph Values and Culture: The Social Shaping of the Future. Among his published articles are “Collective Action across Borders” (Sociological Perspectives), “The Values of Global Futures” (Current Sociology), and the “The Role of the Internet in Transnational Mobilization” (World Society Studies).

Topic: Transnational Mobilization and the Internet

How do new media impact social movements and collective action within countries and across borders? What lessons can be drawn from a close empirical examination of the role of different media interfaces in the pioneering case of the Zapatista uprising and the connections between the insurgent Mayan peasants in Chiapas and their allies in postindustrial metropoles around the globe?

The structure of the presentation:

• Chip’s introduction
• Schulz overview and global village
• Web mobilization compared to other social uprisings
• Collective action across borders
• Internet and the Zapatista uprising
• Activists motivation towards uprisings
• Summary hypotheses

• Chip’s introduction

• Schulz overview and global village

• Web mobilization compared to other social uprisings

• Collective action across borders

• Internet and the Zapatista uprising

• Activists motivation towards uprisings

• Summary hypotheses

Readings

Schulz, Markus S.: “The Role of the Internet in Transnational Mobilization: A Case Study of the Zapatista Movement, 1994-2005,” World Society Studies, Vol. 2007/I., pp. 129-156.

Further recommended background:

Schulz, Markus S.: “Collective Action Across Borders: Opportunity Structure, Network Capacity, and Communicative Praxis in the Age of Advanced Globalization,” Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1998, pp. 587-616.

Schulz, Markus S.: “The Values of Global Futures,” Current Sociology, 2011, 59(2).

https://podcast.cites.illinois.edu/groups/lis592-final/weblog/b98a6/Ali_BousquetFinalSue_Searing_Interview.html